• SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I suppose it would be an extreme game design challenge, but I would play more evil characters if I didn’t have to play as “stupid evil”.

    I want to be a manipulative monster who preys on trust. Of course I’m not going to punch the begger in broad daylight in front of everyone. I want chat him up, gain his trust, and give him a drink laced with medical alcohol so I can then steal his pocket change.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Making it worse is that many games don’t punish you for things we’d consider pretty “evil”. Like, you can walk into people’s houses and search their cupboards and other containers for useful things, and it’s mostly not considered stealing. So, as long as you choose the nice dialogue option when talking to them you stay good.

      A real good vs. evil choice would be one where resources are always tight, and you constantly meet people who need your help along the way. Helping them stretches your resources even more. Or, have people who are able to help you, but you have to stretch the truth about who you are or about your goals to get their support.

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      The world would never allow a truly fun and justifiable Evil character, They didn’t even let Thanos have his shine in the second movie.