• garfaagel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    cal≠kcal

    1 gallon gasoline contains 31 million small calories, while the human caloric requirements are given in large calories. 1000 small calories = 1 large calorie. So the calculations are off by a factor of 1000. The confusion stems from the fact that both are commonly referred to as “calories”, for some stupid reason.

    So in reality you would have to drink another gallon in just 2-3 weeks.

  • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    People here talk so much shit about reddit, but post shit from reddit, copy reddit, and talk like redditors.

  • frank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Obviously a good joke, and of course obligatory cal/kcal discrepancy here. This just seems like a good place to put this info:

    Calories on labels are for calories absorbed, not for calories in the food (same with the 4/9/4 rule). So it’d be much less for gasoline, if it were possible to label with nutritional info.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      As far as I know calories are measured with a Bomb calorimeter meaning you are wrong.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        I was pretty sure of this too, and someone who used to work for the FDA told me it was calculated not measured 99% of the time

        Here’s a good video with some supporting evidence. I’ve looked it up for a couple foods; calculated calories on em

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UuN5HXctmYk

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    So apparently they’re starting to create machines with biological parts. I wonder how long until we get artificial stomachs capable of using anything not explodey or caustic for fuel?

    • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It would already be awesome if we could hack or genetically engineer our gut biome to produce all needed vitamins and proteins out of carbohydrates and fats. Theoretically then we could live just off of sugar or oil. Plus some minerals.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Right? And can we get some kind of metering system so we don’t pack on extra fat?

        People are afraid of a cybernetic future but I’m sitting here wondering just how healthy we can make the human body.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      In order of worst to best case scenario the human body will reject, wear down, or scar around any and all implanted foreign materials or objects. Implants of every type have a shelf life, some long enough to never worry about removal. The best method to secure implants are to bones, but the only nearby bones for the stomach are the hips and spine, with organ cavity linings being problematically in the way for most attachments. For the digestive system it would need to be extremely resistant to corrosion and it would also need to be nontoxic as it would inevitably enter the bloodstream. Even teeth fillings are only rated for about a decade at most.

      So, to be blunt, no such technology exists on this earth nor any speculation on how it ever might.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sorry did you mean powering a machine with food? We have those, there is a university somewhere that throws copious amounts of expired mayo into an Anaerobic Digestor which produces fuel for a combustion engine.