• Stantana@lemmy.sambands.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This article seems to mix antizionism and critique of the state of Israel with antisemitism. One could argue that the article is a tool to curb critique of the state of Israel by abusing the general dislike of antisemitism. That would be war propaganda.

    • WallEx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah I think you’re right. I’m not taking a side, both parties use disinformation in this conflict, the technical abilities that Israel owns are far more advanced though, as in, they cut of the entire internet for Gaza, didn’t they? So there wouldn’t be any alternative sources of information.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      DARPA, and the national science foundation provide grants to AI backed social graph disinformation eradiction efforts.

      Same thing, different paint job.

      Sarcasm, but only just. I hope nobody’s dumb enough in the US government to say we need to make propaganda online, but they might forget to use the politically correct smoke screen combat disinformation online.

  • pleasemakesense@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    anyways, I wanted to say that I’m not a proponent of the content of this article, but I think it is important that people see it

    • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Informative post, never mind the downvotes. Some users seem to be confused about how to use votes and think they should vote based on sympathy with - instead of relevancy of - the posted content.

  • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    At this point where they say this that openly I think I’ll stop all the efforts at arguing online unless the opponent is quite clearly not a bot.

    Lem’s “Bomba megabitowa” comes true in everything.

    I like Lem and one may find some solutions in his approaches. But I also liked the Web like 20-15 years ago, it was nice.

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Covering APIs, AI-driven translators and other tools based on their proprietary large language model, it is already collaborating with some of the best-known experts in the field, including at AI21 Labs, Google, and Microsoft.

    Imagine AI being able to instantly check whether a post violates the terms of service (TOS) of the specific platform where it’s made.

    Imagine the ability to report said post on the spot.

    And if it doesn’t violate the TOS, to instantly generate the best counterargument?

    Kind of a weird apocalyptic way to kick humans off the internet:

    When online opinions no longer matter because, he who has the strongest computer, will have the best AI. Which will also have the best public opinion(s).

    At that point, only places where people can confirm you are a real human will matter.

    • ArghZombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The last election was in 2006. 17 years ago. The median age of people there is only 20. Most of those people didn’t vote for anyone, let alone Hamas. And even those that did vote, Hamas got less than 50% of the vote.

      Also, nice use of ableist slurs there. Is that really appropriate?

    • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Decades of illegal occupation, racial segregation and genocide are severe violations of human rights and of international law.

      Also your ableism is quite telling about your character

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          So you’re saying all people of Palestinian descent are terrorists? Or just all Arabs are terrorists? Or just people who are kept in prison terrorists?

          What is the criteria to make somebody a terrorist? I’m not talking about the military, I’m not talking about the government, I’m talking about the civilians.

          And even if you say every Gazan civilian is a terrorist, at what age do they become terrorists? Are the babies terrorist? Are the 5-year-old’s terrorist?

          • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Obviously at the moment of conception, if the person you ask is racist enough …

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              It geuinely seems like people think someone can be born a terrorist… Which is just another form of racism, with a new phrase attached to it.

              • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                If you want to kill mothers and babies on a regular basis you need at least some kind of official “justification”. This of course applies to both sides. While the government and military of Israel uses islamophobia, Hamas is using antisemitism to justify their barbaric crimes. In both cases its in fact just racism if you look under the propaganda surface.