There’s difficulty, then there’s balancing issue. We expect difficulty, but not invalidating certain builds entirely.

Only NFTs died, so I guess part of crypto did.

So teams don’t use intermediates to avoid using up their soft tyre allocation. They should add some wiggle ground as the FIA can be slow at announcing things, but ultimately this is all on Ferrari.

There are lots of comments on that thread trying to divert the issue by pointing out the violence done by the western countries. I would assume his comment was in response to one of these comments, so he wouldn’t be the one to bring up the West into the discussion.

That tweet doesn’t mention the word disgusting at all.

And AMD is following along with the stupid naming scheme in the next generation.

The problem is not reducing population, it’s to have our economic system be able to cope with population reduction instead of just collapsing. Do you think we have any hope of changing it for the better?

When judging the action presented in the comics, who really cares whether it happened or not. I’m not judging the author for something he did, but something that a lot of people in this thread seems to be cheering for, which is to scream at people for doing something they disagree with and think as pathetic. You know, the type of behaviour that the American Conservative like to do to people they don’t like. Those kinds of behaviour are just horrible, imo, regardless of how good your intention for doing it is.

As for whether I’m autistic, I don’t know. I’ve never tried getting a diagnosis.

Why would you attack someone just for being queer?

The risk of death is not the same. What idiot would equate the risk of death from being stunned to being shot by a gun that they would do the exact same thing when confronted with either of them?

And which of those situations are improved by you screaming at a person walking around with a holstered gun? Does it make them more likely to conceal carry or not bring a gun at all? I would say in most situations, people who already open carry will be more encouraged to do so by your actions.

I consider actions like these as being more damaging to the anti-gun movement than anything.

A less than lethal weapon would also, presumably, has less of a deterrent than a gun, wouldn’t you agree?

Also, you’re assuming that every bigot that dare to bash queer people would also want to be a murderer, which is not likely. Attacking from behind is more likely, but the same thing can still happen even if they are not armed.

With conceal carry, now you have the exact same probability of being bashed by bigots as not being armed, but you now are more likely to be tried for murder or manslaughter, which the exact thing you’re using as argument against open carrying, so that doesn’t make sense.

Saying might makes right means you are defending genocide as long as the one doing it is the stronger party, got it.

Also, why would anyone protest against Hamas? My country does not support Hamas, so what would protesting against them even do? People protest against Israel because their countries are supporting them while they are indiscriminately killing civilians. Do you not even grasp such a basic concept?

Are you sure I’m the one that has no idea how the world works? Its not the one that can’t even deny any of the stuff I mentioned, but still wants to claim that no genocide is occurring?

Chastise is probably not the right word, excuse me for my poor English vocab. You are telling them not to do something without providing an alternative that would also help them in the short term. That is, in some way, putting them in a corner.

Also, its not them taking a risk, it’s them weighing the risk of being bashed with the risk of having to shoot a bigot.

If they decide that the risk of someone trying to bash them is much lower while open carrying, obviously that means the risk of having to shoot them is also lower.

Good old Lemmy, where providing a different perspective gets you downvoted to hell simply because it’s not the popular view. I’d even say we are much worse than Reddit when it comes to this, which is ironic.

What claim did he make that require a citation?

Doesn’t make it a bad idea to reduce the chance of getting in trouble. You’re just putting them in a corner by chastising them for finding a way to protect themselves.

Neither does the act of putting a gun in a holster, does it? It’s not like she’s screaming at a guy brandishing a gun around, was she? Now that would be something worthy of screaming about.

There’s collateral damage, then there’s levelling cities, blocking aids to cause famine, bombing and raiding hospitals and lying about the presence of terrorists, shooting at civilians in the middle of the road, bombing ambulances, bombing journalists, bombing aid workers, etc. Just admit at this point that you’re just lying to justify a genocide because you hate Palestinians for some reason.

Not always. See Japan and Korea, for instance.