• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 个月前

    creepy: a buttload of out-of-date routers were infected with chinese malware and unknowingly used as a botnet in a cyberattack

    creepier: the fbi was able to take control of all of the routers and wipe the malware

    creepiest: the router owners were unaware anything had happened

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 个月前

      I’m curious as to whether the router manufacturer included a back door or if the FBI used the same exploit that was used to infect the routers in the first place.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        edit-2
        5 个月前

        probably the latter, since all of these routers were unpatched, out-of-date routers, and that’s how they were exploited in the first place.

        however, the article specifically states that the court documents are all redacted when it comes to the details

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 个月前

        It’s not entirely uncommon for the latter to happen. Some greyhats have done similar things to clear out botnets in the past. It still counts as unauthorized access to a system though so most avoid doing so even if the intended result is beneficial

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 个月前

        The U.S. has a very robust hacking capability, we just don’t advertise it and we concentrate on shutting down or infiltrating critical infrastructure in times of war or espionage.

        Instead of hacking China to steal industrial secrets, we hack them to see if we could say open or close all the floodgates at the 3 Gorges Damn… China hacks us to steal state and industrial secrets, though they are now starting to focus on infrastructure.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      I would assume they used the same exploit as the botnet because only the NSA gets to use the fancy secret backdoors and secret list of vulnerabilities.

      Unless the routers were also managed by ISPs in which case they might have just had builtin remote access/remote commands

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 个月前

        if the routers were managed by ISPs, the ISPs would have kept them up-to-date. these were not home users, but small business users, and a standard service contract would have covered that sort of thing. considering the issue was so widespread and over several different ISPs and different devices, the most likely explanation is that they were owned and managed by the user.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 个月前

          I used to fall for that logic that an ISP would keep my router up to date. It doesn’t happen.

          In my case I had the same ISP router for over four years and there was a known bug streaming video. I didn’t have privileges to update and they refused to. Nor would they replace my router with a current one because “it’s not broken and hasn’t yet reached the age we switch them out”.

          My solution was to stop renting the router. Also stop renting set top boxes and drop phone and cable service. I’m much happier with only internet for however many years that’s been and I have more control over keeping my network up to date and configured properly

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 个月前

            ymmv, but most ISPs do actually push updates to their hardware. i’m not surprised to hear that some don’t, however.

            of course, you’re right that the best option is to bring your own hardware. not only is it safer, but, in the long run, you save a ton of money.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 个月前

          I suspect it might have been problematic to tip off the malware operators that the network was about to be shut down. Apparently customers are going to be informed via their ISPs now. I guess some if them may decide to junk the routers.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          5 个月前

          My ISP has never had info on my router, for 20+ years. Was there something in the story I missed about these being ISP issued routers?

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            5 个月前

            The ISPs don’t need info on the routers…

            The FBI has identified the routers; if they’re able to connect to them and issue commands, they clearly know the IPs of those routers and thus the ISP servicing that IP. The ISP knows which of their customers is/was assigned a particular IP.

          • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 个月前

            Probably works the other way around - FBI detects the problem at various IP addresses, patches them, then contacts the iISP and asks them to contact the customer who had x.y.z IP address

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 个月前

        How would you like the router owners to have been alerted?

        By two men in black showing up at their doors, of course.

        :-)