• doors_3@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Many popular sites have dropped it. New sites often don’t support it in the first place. In cases they do, it’s a truncated version. Only a snippet/topic is visible and rest relinks to a browser. It is still better than nothing but the halcyon days of RSS are gone, IMO.

    • PeachMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      The truncated versions are annoying, but honestly I understand why. These websites live entirely off ad sales, without them they go bankrupt. So letting RSS readers scrape an ad-free version of an article makes no sense to them.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’ve been using RSS for literally 18 years and that has always been the case. News sites make money by advertising, they get no advertising if you just read the RSS feed, so they give you a snippet.

      It would be nice if every site was like Arstechnica and gave you a full text ad free RSS feed when you pay to subscribe.

      • thehatfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        The difficulties in monetisation is what had been slowly killing RSS support on websites. There have been services that have tried to solve this problem, one is mentioned in the article, but they don’t seem to have had wide adoption.

        It’s not just inserting ads either, today it’s also the pervasive tracking that makes money.

        RSS was great for things like personal blogs, but commercial sites came to see little value in it, and have been dropping it as a result.