The laws violate the First Amendment because they require social media sites to abjure most content moderation, and platform speech they disapprove of.
The laws violate the First Amendment because they require social media sites to abjure most content moderation, and platform speech they disapprove of.
It shouldn’t be a surprise. Cases where the Court did the right thing or refused to look at overturning the right thing. (Only been collecting these for a month or so.)
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-transgender-bathrooms-indiana-35c59c4dbe94668592c96e2a27c8d517
https://newrepublic.com/post/179149/supreme-court-samuel-alito-traditional-people-bigots-lgbtq
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-from-trump-allied-lawyers-over-2020-election-lawsuit-in-michigan/
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-from-3-gop-house-members-over-500-mask-fines/
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-02-20/supreme-court-rejects-property-rights-challenge-to-rent-control
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-immigration-texas-razor-wire-9daef6bd316211b6633ece718e505187
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/u-s-supreme-court-wont-take-up-wa-capital-gains-tax-challenge/
Imagine how much better we’d be doing with Clarence impeached.