Here’s a table I adapted from Louis Rossman’s video on the levels of piracy, grey areas and his morals and ethics on it. (spreadsheet file)

I tried to condense each rank and make it less about a specific type of media like CD audio or DVD video, along with a table of simplified characteristics of each situation. Of course more levels can be added and there are many situations not covered. This hierarchy is simply the way Louis ordered it from more to less justifiable; he respects people can think about it differently and I do too. He suggests that he doesn’t really care about people that pirate without giving a shit about creators, and that he only has a problem with people who aren’t honest with themselves about their motivations.

Setting legality aside, what ‘level of piracy’ is morally or ethically acceptable to you?

  • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    6 months ago

    what ‘level of piracy’ is morally or ethically acceptable to you?

    If I could, I would download a car.

  • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Setting legality aside, what ‘level of piracy’ is morally or ethically acceptable to you?

    All levels. I think that human beings are morally and ethically obligated to do anything that causes a corporation to lose or miss out on profits. They exploit and disrespect our power as consumers by changing EULA after we purchase products, I see no reason not to rob these mfs blind.

    If it’s an indie game I’ll pay for it after pirating, if I enjoy the game.

    • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I hate opening this way, but, as an “artist,” DL everything. Art deserves to be pushed away from profit motives and i hate hearing, “but your fave musicians wont get ur money!” Theyre not getting money off of record sales anyway, they hardly ever did. Ill put out what i make for free download. If ever ppl seem crazy enough to wanna donate, ill look into opening up those avenues, but its not like thats happening anytime soon. Way i see it, its not like i could stop if i wanted to. Why ask for money and limit how many ppl i can reach?

      • _sora@mast.lat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        @Pan_Ziemniak @JimboDHimbo not an artist, but i 100% agree art should never be for profit. Ethics and piracy aside, profit is the reason why every big IP ends up being dog shit eventually. When passion is over, move on to the next cool and fun project. I’d rather spend all my savings (if i had any of course) on some random indie dev or music producer on their patreons than throwing a single penny to [insert big tech/media company]'s endless need of money. They don’t deserve it both morally and artistically. Hell if art wasn’t for profit, we wouldn’t be discussing piracy, but “who should I invest to”

    • BellyPurpledGerbil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’d say for myself it’s a tit for tat situation.

      If the company I hypothetically pirate from is a total prick, mistreats their employees, donates a part of the money they earned from my purchase to lobby to my government to reduce the rights of minorities, I won’t give a single fuck. I may even just never touch their product out of spite.

      Are they inoffensive and fairly neutral? I likely won’t pirate if I have the means to buy it.

      Are they basically ConcernedApe? I will follow them to the ends of the earth showering them with praise and riches. Never pirate and would actively shame those who do

      • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Are they basically ConcernedApe?

        Literally the main person in mind when I was writing that last sentence 😂😂 he can have my money.

        Edit: I pirated stardew initially, then bought three copies over the years on different platforms, either for myself or as gifts for friends.

  • zoey@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Where’s the “Rent is 60% of my monthly wage, so I can’t afford a 120 euro game.”

    • Rentlar@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      In a sense, not being able to afford it is itself a region lock on it.

      • MantidSys@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you assume they’re from countries with weaker economies. Meanwhile, I live in the US, and I survive under the poverty line. Nothing about the US is ‘region-locked’, I’m just treated like shit for being disabled. It’s a lack of income first and foremost.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Thank goodness LM can’t see this because that would be the cue for a corporate bootlicker to say “yOu dOnt HavE to PlAY thEm tO sURviVe”

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which of course makes no sense - if you don’t have the money to buy it either way, pirating has no effect on revenue.

  • N_Crow@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    I pirate because I dont earn my wage in dollaridoos, and I believe information and culture is a human right that shoudln’t have any impact on me being able to pay my bills.

    If I can, and want, I’ll pay. Other than that big corporations that boasts about record sales every year could cry some more about me downloading an .iso for all I care.

  • zygo_histo_morpheus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think that a system where we should abstain from things that are basically free to reproduce (i.e. things you can pirate) is dumb. There are many movies that I probably wouldn’t pay money to but that I’ve pirated. The companies that own the rights to the movie don’t lose any sale they would have otherwise made but I get whatever enjoyment I get from watching the movie at least, so it’s a net win.

    When I pay may bills at the end of the month I also put some money towards paying for things that I’ve pirated that I like, usually with a focus on smaller creators. It doesn’t really feel meaningful to pay for a marvel movie for example. It’s not really a perfect system but neither is artificially limiting the access to digital media.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Warner Bros. is an example of a movie company that gives zero fucks to any of the artists producing their movies, not sure what good supporting them will do.

    • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Copying is not theft. It does not remove the original.

      If I send you a PDF copy of a book that I own, that I scanned into a PDF myself; that is not theft, that is ownership. So long as I make you pay nothing for that copy; and I do mean $0.00, I cannot charge you for any costs incurred while making that copy; I am not breaking the law until a judge summons me before them and tells me I am abusing my rights and are summarily breaking the law in another manner as is judge’s right to do.

      I own the physical book and I am allowed to enjoy it in any manner I see fit…including loaning the book to you physically or digitally in perpetuity.

      The law supports and recognizes fair use and ownership. It is up to us not to abuse that ownership. I do not recommend making 1,000,000,000 copies of a book and giving them away just because you are mad at the author. That’s an asshole move and likely to get the metaphorical judge I described involved in the matter.

      Similarly; it is an asshole move for a content creator to sell you a copy of a book or some other media and then go about trying to tell you how you may or may not enjoy the material you just purchased. They can recommend ways to enjoy it; but they do not have an enforceable right, even through contracts, to tell you that you cannot exercise your ownership rights in a certain way…unless you overdo it to asshole levels and a judge and/or the police get involved.

  • Timwi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wish to live in a society in which this question is a moot point. Creators should have the freedom to create without having to worry about the goodwill of their audience, or worse, marketing strategies. Fans should have the freedom to access art without having to worry about the well-being of the creator, or worse, suffering guilt. Anything that is not aimed at creating and maintaining this state of being is inhumane.

  • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I refuse to pay for pirated content out of principal. It’s bad enough that I’m infringing copyright (and boy do I!) but commercialized piracy rubs me the wrong way. I even prefer Bittorrent over Usenet and FOSS media software over commercial software. Yarr!

  • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I pirate because I’m broke, and when I’m not broke I pirate because I want to test before buying, or because fuck this company in particular (like with Disco Elysium or anything EA)

    If you’ve got the means to pay for media and the company or person that produced it isn’t awful, you should probably purchase it. But I don’t particularly care either way, do what you want

  • pelikan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    The whole point of “ethical” piracy is ridiculous. It’s old good corporate anti-piracy propaganda but rechewed with some progressive takes. “You wouldn’t download an indie car”, literally. If you need some justifications and excuses for piracy, than just don’t pirate at all. The fact that i’m downloading some game from torrent because i’ve broken purchased DVD with it never makes me more ethical in any way than some other leecher on the same torrent who’s never going to pay for it.