• maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    *bad Devs

    Or devs who don’t give a shit. Most places have a lot of people who don’t give a shit because the company does not give a shit about them either.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      What’s the diff between a bad dev and a dev that doesn’t care? Either way, whether ist lack of skill or care, a bad dev is a bad dev at the end of the day.

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I can be good at a trade, but if I’m working for a shit company with shit pay and shit treatment, they’re not going to get my best work.

        You get out what you put in, that’s something employers don’t realise.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The difference is whether the fault for the leak of your personal data rests with the worker who was incompetent, or the employer who didn’t pay for proper secure software.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            Depends on the case TBH. If devs barely have time and are constantly crunching due to mismanagement, or are extremely disengaged due to mismanagement, I wouldn’t fault them.

            Usually it’s the lacking processes, though. There are ways to make sure this doesn’t happen, and it doesn’t depend on the individual, but always the organization.