• melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No that would still end up with a government. If I’m gonna risk my ass like that for something, its going to be something I actually want.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        i have a theory that anarchy always ends in some form of government. I suppose you could have an anarchic government. But i would much rather have a difference government, with the same principles to begin with tbh. Anarchy is more of a driving force to me than anything else.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Everything always ends in something else. If it didn’t, it wouldn’t be an ending, or would violate thermodynamics.

          The point is nobody being in charge, in shrinking authority while keeping coordination.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            that’s an interesting place to use a thermodynamics jumpscare, but frankly i think we just need proper isolation from state and federal government, each has their own purpose. They should do specifically what is most productive for themselves and nothing more.

            But that’s just me being fed up with shit being entirely inconsistent from state to state for no fucking reason.