Now if only anyone could trust a single thing he said or believe this was true…
He has n’t backed off anything. Like always, he’s lying.
I mean, at least he’s consistent in that. He lies to his supporters and opponents. I just hope no one is stupid enough to believe him.
You just posted a link to an entire newspaper that believes him
It’s worth reading both sides for context. I am well aware of which papers cater to whom. Only reading your own circle jerk doesn’t actually make you well informed though.
Only if you want to spread Donald Trump‘s lies while pretending they’re facts. I don’t particularly care for spreading all-right propaganda and misinformation, knowing they are lies, as you admit, nor do all of the people who are downvoting this post.
I don’t need to read articles like this to know that Donald Trump is a liar, and this article certainly doesn’t point that out.
Knowing what lies your opponents are repeating allows you to counter them.
Knowing lies as one thing. You are actively and knowingly spreading them.
With the caption “he’s lying again.” Sticking your head in the sand and copying the ministry of magic’s approach after the triwizard cup isn’t going to help anything. Trying to “ban” misinformation just leads to lies on both sides. Reading both sides yourself and knowing what parts are true and lies allows you to correctly argue it to others.
MBFC Rating for Washington Times:
Right-Center Bias/Mixed Accuracy
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Although the Washington Times has an extreme right editorial bias, they report straight news with a much lower bias. Therefore, we rate them right-center biased overall. We also rate them Questionable and factually mixed due to poor sourcing, holding editorial positions contrary to scientific consensus, and numerous failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Numerous Failed Fact Checks, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency
- Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
- Factual Reporting: MIXEDCountry: USA
- Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
- Media Type: Newspaper
- Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
- MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Launched in 1982, The Washington Times is a daily newspaper concentrating on politics and news. Based in Washington, D.C., The Washington Times was founded by a self-professed messiah, Korean Sun Myung Moon. According to its parent company, during Washington Times’ 20th anniversary, Moon said: “The Washington Times is responsible for letting the American people know about God” and “The Washington Times will become the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world.”
Larry Beasley is the current president and CEO of The Washington Times, and he will remain as The Times’s chief executive officer. However, according to a Washington Times article, Christopher Dolan was announced as the next president of The Washington Times, effective January 1st, 2019. Mr. Dolan also retained his role as The Times’ top editor.
On January 7th, 2021, the day after Trump supporters stormed the Capitol Building in Washington DC, The Washington Times falsely published an article claiming Antifa was behind the attack. They subsequently corrected the article after it was proven false: Facial recognition firm claims Antifa infiltrated Trump protesters who stormed Capitol.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Operations Holdings Inc is the Washington Times owner, owned by the Unification Church of South Korea, through their holding company HSA-UWC (Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity). In 1954, Reverend Sun Myung Moon founded this religious movement in South Korea, known for its mass weddings, and its members are referred to as “Moonies.” According to a Guardian article, former members have claimed that the Unification Church is a religious cult that utilizes brainwashing techniques. Subscriptions and advertising fund the paper.
Analysis / Bias
The Washington Times, although praised by conservative political leaders, has also been criticized for being the mouthpiece of the Unification Church. The Washington Times also has a strong pro-Christian bias, with a whole section dedicated to the Bible. They have also published articles that criticize left-leaning Christians such as this: “George Soros and his ‘rented evangelicals’ outed by Christian leaders.”
In review, The Washington Times utilizes emotionally loaded language in their headlines such as “Gowdy puts Comey on blast after FBI ex-chief’s snarky ‘search for the truth’ tweet” and “NBC News’ Mika Brzezinski problem.” When it comes to sourcing, The Washington Times re-publishes articles from the least biased Associated Press and occasionally utilizes credible sources such as Refinery29. In examining several articles, we found that The Times either does not source information or links back to themselves (internal linking) to information not relevant to the article. This article is an excellent example of internal linking: “Mueller: FBI did not mislead Flynn into lying.” Internal linking is a technique used to increase page views and improve SEO, increasing advertising revenue. There is nothing wrong with internal linking if the link relates to relevant information, but it does not in the case of The Times.
When evaluating how The Times covers science, we found they published an analysis/opinion piece by L. Todd Wood that promotes a climate change conspiracytheory: “global warming and then the climate change narrative was cooked up by America’s adversaries to enable our enemies to eventually dominate us.” According to IFCN fact checker Climate Feedback, The Washington Times published an article with very low scientific credibility. However, when covering straight news on climate change, they report accurately, as seen in this article: “Trump admin releases National Climate Assessment with dire warnings.”
Failed Fact Checks
- “5.7 million — that’s how many illegal immigrants might have voted” in 2008. – False
- Taxpayers paid $4 million for President Obama to play golf with Tiger Woods. – Mostly False
- Christ Church “ripping out” a plaque dedicated George Washington because it might offend people. – Mostly False
- In passing H.R. 1 in March 2019, House Democrats voted in favor of allowing non-citizens to vote. – False
- Then-Vice President Joe Biden publicly revealed the special-operations unit’s identity responsible for Osama bin Laden’s killing during a 3 May 2011 speech at the Atlantic Council Awards Dinner.– False
- Did the U.S. Department of Homeland Security say that they fear illegal border crossings may increase the novel coronavirus spread? – False
- Did Joe Biden say he attended college at HBCU Delaware State University? –** False**
- A facial recognition software company identified Antifa supporters at the Capitol Hill riots. – False
- Biden team won’t admit it, but the COVID-19 pandemic is over – False
- “COVID-19 shots are not vaccines” because they don’t “prevent one from becoming infected” – Inaccurate
Although the Washington Times has an extreme right editorial bias, they report straight news with a much lower bias. Therefore, we rate them right-center biased overall. We also rate them questionable and factually mixed due to poor sourcing, holding editorial positions contrary to scientific consensus, and numerous failed fact checks. (7/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 01/08/2022)
I’m sorry, but letting states decide what are human rights is about as “centrist” as the Confederate States of America
