• metaStatic@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    exactly, it would be trivial to have a whitelist server side and now only ad friendly apps can access the videos. they only still work because it’s worth keeping those viewers in the system for the time being.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      Technically NewPipe simply parses the website and is seen as a web browser from YouTube’s point of view.

      That how they bypass the API’s TOS, they don’t use it.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Trivial? What information does this whitelist hold that can’t be spoofed? It’s not like apps have to tell the truth about what they are.

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        People do that? Just have their code go on the internet and tell lies?! This is a Christian internet!

        (yes it’s /s)

      • passepartout@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is what current implementations like Revanced do. The endgame will be fullblown DRM. Until then, it will be a cat and mouse game.