An AI-run fighter jet went up against another controlled by a human pilot in a drill, the US has said. The aircraft flew at up to speeds of 1,200mph during combat that's often referred to as a dogfight.
The aircraft flew up to speeds of 1,200mph. DARPA did not reveal which aircraft won the dogfight.
Only the losing side is subject to war crimes trials, and no doubt rules of engagement will be developed and followed to prevent people going to jail due to “bad kills”.
There are really no “bad kills” in the armed services, there’s just limited exposure of public scandals.
Especially for the US who doesn’t subject its self to international courts like The Hague. So any atrocities, accidents, or war crimes will still just be internal scandals and temporary.
Not an international court, and ergo an internal matter, and a temporary one. Probably won’t be noticed by the majority of international news coverage let alone the international community in political terms.
So that’s very different to The Hague, which might consider trying an entire area of a millitary or an entire operation, or reason for a conflict… A larger process, that’s external and recognised by the world community and significant to international journalism.
If it is a bad kill, is there a person who will go to jail or be executed for it?
Only the losing side is subject to war crimes trials, and no doubt rules of engagement will be developed and followed to prevent people going to jail due to “bad kills”.
There are really no “bad kills” in the armed services, there’s just limited exposure of public scandals.
Especially for the US who doesn’t subject its self to international courts like The Hague. So any atrocities, accidents, or war crimes will still just be internal scandals and temporary.
Same as it is today.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/23/politics/eddie-gallagher-navy-seal-trial/index.html
Not an international court, and ergo an internal matter, and a temporary one. Probably won’t be noticed by the majority of international news coverage let alone the international community in political terms.
So that’s very different to The Hague, which might consider trying an entire area of a millitary or an entire operation, or reason for a conflict… A larger process, that’s external and recognised by the world community and significant to international journalism.
If a country implements murder machines that efficiently slay a continent then does not stop at the sea.
Will nobody for real do nothing?
Is that your belief for bad kills? Same with gas and engineered disease?
A murder machine would likely run out of supplies before then (either fuel or bullets).
You’ve jumped to a theoretical sci fi abstraction, so don’t feel the need to respond.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
You don’t have an original thought in your head. Look at you, you’re repeating things I said to you. What a joke.
Very mature
Like if someone made a biological weapon that wipes out a continent
Will someone go to prison?
It’s no difference