The Supreme Court brushed aside a lawsuit Monday from Republican Senate candidate Kari Lake challenging the use of electronic voting machines in Arizona.
That’s a amateur untrained kid. Really ask yourself, if you had practice and a demo machine, how fast could you swap a hard drive and replace the QA sticker. 15 seconds / 20 seconds?
They were laughably easy to hack. If you go back to the early 2000’s, you can read up all about the Diebold voting machines and how vulnerable they were. Plus, it didn’t help perceptions that Diebold’s CEO was a major donator to GWB’s campaign:
Since then, many current Voting Machine companies have taken the advice of their detractors, and have worked to increase security on their devices while also providing a verifiable paper trail. (They also saw what happened to Diebold, who lost so many contracts due to the bad publicity that they had to let themselves be acquired in order to purge that name). The companies were basically shamed into doing a better job by all the voting security researchers (many of which are highlighted in that Wiki article).
The voting process is so much more secure and trustworthy than it was 20 years ago, mainly because of all the people paying attention to it.
That’s actually too bad. The electronic voting machine are laughably easy to hack.
Edit: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/an-11-year-old-changed-election-results-on-a-replica-florida-state-website-in-under-10-minutes
That’s a amateur untrained kid. Really ask yourself, if you had practice and a demo machine, how fast could you swap a hard drive and replace the QA sticker. 15 seconds / 20 seconds?
There was an entire lawsuit about how they were actually not easy to hack. Fox News lost it. But do provide your sources.
Everyones favorite source - “trust me, bro.”
Well then don’t trust me.
https://www.npr.org/2023/04/18/1170339114/fox-news-settles-blockbuster-defamation-lawsuit-with-dominion-voting-systems
https://www.cnn.com/business/live-news/fox-news-dominion-trial-04-18-23/index.html
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/04/18/business/fox-news-dominion-trial-settlement
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Voting_Systems_v._Fox_News_Network
This is why our democracy is in danger. So yeah, trust my sources, bro?
I wasn’t meaning that you had no sources…I was referring to the asshat you replied to.
I did a poorly job of communicating stuff
FWIW I thought it was very clear.
“I make up facts that help my party stay relevant!”
The Republiclown way!!
Is the Kraken in the room with us now?
They were laughably easy to hack. If you go back to the early 2000’s, you can read up all about the Diebold voting machines and how vulnerable they were. Plus, it didn’t help perceptions that Diebold’s CEO was a major donator to GWB’s campaign:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_Election_Solutions
Since then, many current Voting Machine companies have taken the advice of their detractors, and have worked to increase security on their devices while also providing a verifiable paper trail. (They also saw what happened to Diebold, who lost so many contracts due to the bad publicity that they had to let themselves be acquired in order to purge that name). The companies were basically shamed into doing a better job by all the voting security researchers (many of which are highlighted in that Wiki article).
The voting process is so much more secure and trustworthy than it was 20 years ago, mainly because of all the people paying attention to it.
Yeah. Pity all the fraud that the republicans found was engineered by the republicans.