“It is not we, the West, who should fear a clash with Putin, but the other way around,” Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski said.

A war between Vladimir Putin’s Russia and NATO would end with Moscow’s “inevitable defeat,” Poland’s Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski said Thursday.

"It is not we, the West, who should fear a clash with Putin, but the other way around,” Sikorski said during a speech to the Sejm, the lower house of Poland’s parliament. “It is worth reminding about this, not to increase the sense of threat in the Russians, because NATO is a defensive pact, but to show that an attack by Russia on any of the members of the Alliance would end in its [Russia’s] inevitable defeat.”

Sikorski, who was laying out Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s vision for the new government’s foreign policy, said Russia’s military and economic potential “pales in comparison to that of the West,” as NATO has three times as many military personnel, three times the aerial resources and four times as many ships as Russia.

Western allies and top military officials have become increasingly worried about a potential spillover of violence from Putin’s ongoing full-scale invasion of Ukraine — as the Russian leader continues to issue veiled nuclear threats toward the West and stashes atomic weapons in Belarus, which borders NATO members Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    A Hail Mary play where “taking them down with me” is considered a win. Humans do that all the time and get awarded for it. Add a nuclear arsenal to it and, well…there’s your answer.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      A Hail Mary play where “taking them down with me” is considered a win.

      Can you name a single war in history where anyone did this?

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        For obvious reasons (ie: we’re still here) it’s never happened. But you can say the same thing about a former US president facing criminal fraud charges in court and the US dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

        Just because it never happened before doesn’t mean the conditions are not ripe for it to happen now (or in the near future).

        • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not to mention the fact that all it takes is for one nuclear exchange to happen, and the world as we know it ceases to exist. The stakes are incredibly high.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          And every Russian is going to go along with Putin’s suicide-by-NATO? This isn’t a comic book.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah, definitely. Quite a lot actually.

        Edit: Oh, I got a downvote. Sorry, did you want me to Google for you, or…?

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I didn’t downvote you, but “trust me bro” contributes absolutely nothing to the conversation FWIW