• Rooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    228
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    If this is true, then we should prepare to be shout at by chatgpt why we didnt knew already that simple error.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        139
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Hey ChatGPT, how can I …

        “Locking as this is a duplicate of [unrelated question]”

      • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        And then links to a similar sounding but ultimately totally unrelated site.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honestly, that wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      You joke.

      This would have been probably early last year? Had to look up how to do something in fortran (because fortran) and the answer was very much in the voice of that one dude on the Intel forums who has been answering every single question for decades(?) at this point. Which means it also refused to do anything with features newer than 1992 and was worthless.

      Tried again while chatting with an old work buddy a few months back and it looks like they updated to acknowledging f99 and f03 exist. So assume that was all stack overflow.