The news article is a poor summary of a YouTube video. If you just care to see the door being opened, it’s around 5:13 https://youtu.be/EmqFoojMeD8 but the video itself is more interesting than that.
Sorry for the vagueness. Pannenkoek is like the authority on weird Mario 64 quirks, and makes excellent videos. As soon as you see that name, there’s no need to keep reading – just go watch the video.
Like, this article could have been one sentence: “New Pannenkoek vid just dropped: [link]”
The news article is a poor summary of a YouTube video. If you just care to see the door being opened, it’s around 5:13 https://youtu.be/EmqFoojMeD8 but the video itself is more interesting than that.
I read until it mentioned pannenkoek and immediately clicked away after that.
edit: clicked away from the article to watch the video directly from the source. Go watch the video, pannenkoek is great.
What’s wrong with pannenkoek? Am I out of the loop? I’ve watched a couple of his videos and they were interesting deep dives into SM64.
Sorry for the vagueness. Pannenkoek is like the authority on weird Mario 64 quirks, and makes excellent videos. As soon as you see that name, there’s no need to keep reading – just go watch the video.
Like, this article could have been one sentence: “New Pannenkoek vid just dropped: [link]”
Ohh, gotcha, lol. Yeah, I completely misinterpreted your comment. Thanks for the clarification
Uh-oh, is that some horrible obscure YT drama?
Nah, just poor choice of phrasing on my part. Clarified in edit above.
To answer that, we need to talk about parallel universes
I’m sure the YouTuber meant well and did a deep dive, but without your timestamp, it would take the viewer 5 minutes before getting to the answer.
Where I can literally skimmed a article in 15 seconds.
Unfortunately this article sucks and doesn’t even explain it.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/EmqFoojMeD8
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.