• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    They always were.

    Only now they’ve agreed to pay Reddit for it. This is what their third party lockdown was really all about.

    They’re helping themselves to your Lemmy comments for free, as that’s just how it’s designed. If you post anything publicly anywhere, it’s getting slurped up by a bot somewhere.

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m not a lawyer. But isn’t the reason they had to go to reddit to get permission is because users hand over over ownership to reddit the moment you post. And since there’s no such clause on Lemmy, they’d have to ask the actual authors of the comments for permission instead?

      Mind you, I understand there’s no technical limitation that prevents bots from harvesting the data, I’m talking about the legality. After all, public does not equate public domain.

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        users hand over over ownership to reddit the moment you post

        Not ownership. Just permission to copy and distribute freely. Which basically is necessary to run a service like this, where user-submitted content is displayed.

        And since there’s no such clause on Lemmy, they’d have to ask the actual authors of the comments for permission instead?

        It’s more of a fuzzy area, but simply by posting on a federated service you’re agreeing to let that service copy and display your comments, and sync with other servers/instances to copy and display your comments to their users. It’s baked into the protocol, that your content will be copied automatically all over the internet.

        Does that imply a license to let software be run on that text? Does it matter what the software does with it, like display the content in a third party Mobile app? What about when it engages in text to speech or braille conversion for accessibility? Or index the page for a search engine? Does AI training make any difference at that point?

        The fact is, these services have APIs, and the APIs allow for the efficient copying and ingest of the user-created information, with metadata about it, at scale. From a technical perspective obviously scraping is easy. But from a copyright perspective submitting your content into that technical reality is implicit permission to copy, maybe even for things like AI training.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This form of propaganda is my pet peeve. It’s not “your posts” as soon as you put something to public you don’t get to eat your cake. It’s out there, you shared it. Don’t share it if you don’t want humanity to ingest and use it.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hate to break it to you, but the time to do that was over a year ago, and even then it wasn’t ever really a sure thing - we don’t really know what their backup policies are around that stuff.

      This is what the former power user community that made an exodus from Reddit roughly a year ago has been trying to communicate, but a ton of people here seem to enjoy keeping their toes in the water over there, with rather predictable consequences (literally, the post we’re commenting on).

      All that said: I am very much looking forward to the absolutely titanic lawsuit around GDPR I’m sure is in the works over this.

  • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Some day historians will be able to look back at this moment and be able to determine it was what caused ChatGPT to become horny and weird.

  • myliltoehurts@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So they filled reddit with bot generated content, and now they’re selling back the same stuff likely to the company who generated most of it.

    At what point can we call an AI inbred?

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          They’re not multiple though, edit it and then delete it and it’s gone. They disabled all the tools to do it though so it’s manually or nothing now.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            They just reload a previous cached comment, doesn’t matter how many times you edit or delete, it’s all logged and backed up.

  • FJT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    So it’s going to be a libtarded libtard AI that doesn’t represent the majority of the people, got it.