• bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The implication is it was politically/ideologically motivated. Says it right at the start under “Key Points”

    Did you read the article? It has nothing to do with insider trading.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes I did and I don’t think selling stocks that are being affected by a boycott is illegal or proof of partisan motivation.

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m simply pointing out that this was never about inside trading and it was never mentioned in the article. I’d say it certainly counts as worthy of suspicion, however, given the recent revelations about how he responded to January 6th. Which is also discussed in the article, mind you. But I don’t want to debate that. Just making sure you guys going off about insider trading actually read it.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          Insider trading would be one of the few reasons why this would be illegal which is why I brought it up.

          Why is this news in your mind?

          • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            AGREED! Why is it news that Justice Alito is LITERALLY doing everything the January 6ers who were found guilty of Sedition are TELLING him to do? It’s not like Justice Alito is CREATING Laws for which you and I must follow!

          • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’d say it certainly counts as worthy of suspicion, however, given the recent revelations about how he responded to January 6th.

            But I don’t want to debate that.

            Have a good one

          • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            In itself, this isn’t really news. But that together with the other news about him, I think that’s pretty obvious.

            Why fight this so hard if this isn’t “newsworthy” according to you?