• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean, I just set my system to only check for updates once a week.

    There’s no real reason to install every update, the second it’s available. If there’s a big security fix you should get asap, you’ll hear about it.

  • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    WTF are all these “Refresh of version…” updates? Am I unfresh? Do I need to bathe? (probably)

    Edit: It’s like it saw my post from yesterday and said “oh you like that do you?”

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I had been wondering about that too so I looked it up and apparently it’s just what discover displays whenever there’s an update that doesn’t change the version number which is things like rebuilds with a newer compiler. Very confusing wording, I feel like just “update of version [version]” would be less confusing

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    At some point I think some devs might be refactoring a switch-case into an if-else and calling it an “update” to troll downstreams.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      apparently fools consider a finished app “dead” or “abandoned” if there isn’t a new release every week. so yeah, dev’s will just change a comment to not have their apps shunned

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is why I use the LTS edition for my OS

    Edit: I’m a dum dum and didn’t know flatpak updates showed up like that.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the part i dislike like with Fedora compared with Ubuntu. It is so many updates.

    But since you can choose the time when to install the updates, there is a less of a problem.

    Normally you don’t notice any difference. And updates is much faster to install on Linux in general. Windows eats loads of CPU.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Try whatever ublue floats your boat, it all happens in the background, the power of atomic updates baby, if something breaks, just go back to the previous one…

    • Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I get the same messages, despite using uBlue.
      It’s because of Flatpak.

      I disabled the notifications and enabled daily/ weekly auto-updates of Flatpaks, otherwise I would get spammed to oblivion.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Atomic updates!? I don’t think my PC has the proper radiation shielding for atomic updates…

          • AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The point of my original post was that their update cadence is slower. The point of my followup reply is that they are not devoid of updates, either.

            They have a release every 1-2 years, and it’s packed full for various tweeks, improvements, and new features. They fix broken shit, and enhance where it makes sense.

            I don’t need my window manager to get fad features, and I don’t need constant updates. It does what I want it to do already.

            xfce ftw.