Italian media has said that the pope used a highly derogatory slur against LGBTQ+ people at a bishops conference. The remark may sour attempts by the pope to make the church more welcoming.

Pope Francis allegedly used a highly offensive term to refer to LGBTQ+ people during a closed-door meeting with Italian bishops, Italian media reported on Tuesday.

The major Italian daily newspapers La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera both cited anonymous sources as saying that the pope had made the remark while reiterating his position against gay people becoming priests.

The 87-year-old pontiff was reported as saying that the Catholic seminaries were already too full of “frociaggine” — a highly derogatory term in Italian.

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s interesting that we have documented cases of homosexuality in thousands of different species, and yet not a single other species that practices Catholicism.

    Being gay is more natural than being Catholic.

  • megane-kun@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There’s this saying “a fish is caught through its mouth,” and this is an illustration of what it means. This pope might present this ‘cool’, ‘modern’ image to the public, but his words spoken in private amongst his peers reveals his real stance about these things.


    Edit:‌ proofreading.

  • CatZoomies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Former Catholic, now atheist. I’m glad the Pope is making some progressive steps in the Catholic Church including the LGTBQ+ community.

    I hope this was a misstep, and the case of a 90-year old man from a different country using language that he was not aware is a slur. I really really hope that, or else all that good will was for nothing.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      The dude is ancient; half his vocabulary as a child is probably a slur by this point.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is something more people need to remember.

        The level of casual racism and sexism in the past is staggering when looked at from today, but was no big deal at the time.

        “Mr. Mom” a movie about the insane idea of having a man doing childcare, came out in 1983.

        “Fu Manchu” with Peter Sellers doing yellowface came out in 1980.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah I don’t know if you could make Three Men And A Baby today because the premise “lol men doing childcare, amirite? This is gonna be gold” just isn’t funny anymore. Millennial men are much more active and engaged fathers than previous generations.

          It might be nicely subversive to make a modern reboot of Three Men And A Baby that’s just Clerks but one of them has his son in a thing on his chest. Three 30 year old men competently care for an infant without incident while sharing pithy if relatable dialog.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            People always say that satire is dead, but they don’t realize that it took subversive with it.

  • Cano@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    For those wondering, the word can be roughly translated in english as ::: spoiler Faggotry :::

    Esit: can’t figure out how to mark something as spoiler correctly