• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    i wasn’t speaking in comparison to ebooks. ebooks suck in every way imaginable.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        why are you coming up with these categories? “print is dead” doesn’t mean “because there’s print 2.0 now”

        —radio is dead
        —excuse me, but internet radio is nothing compared to am stations
        —yeah, obviously people who don’t listen to radio don’t want to listen to radio with extra steps
        —what other forms of radio has beaten radio?

        what are you even

        • warmaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I am trying to understand what’s the argument behind your statement. I mean, there are more books being published than ever and there are more readers than ever. So, I fail to imagine how are books dead. That’s why I am asking these questions.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The argument is that no one reads books anymore. Most media consumed today is in modern video and audio formats like YouTube and podcasts. You shouldn’t compare paper books to ebooks, you should compare them to views on YouTube.