Q. Is this really as harmful as you think?

A. Go to your parents house, your grandparents house etc and look at their Windows PC, look at the installed software in the past year, and try to use the device. Run some antivirus scans. There’s no way this implementation doesn’t end in tears — there’s a reason there’s a trillion dollar security industry, and that most problems revolve around malware and endpoints.

  • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Absolutely, but even with control of your computer, if you’re smart, other accounts etc will still be inaccessible by the attacker.

    Not when they get access to the Windows built in desktop spy saving everything it sees.

    • NoiseColor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not if it’s encrypted and if sensitive information is not saved.

      Main point is still that gaining control of someone’s computer against their will is practically impossible today. If someone manages to do it, they already have your files and all the sensitive information they could want. They won’t even bother with this recall. And if you are worried about it, you will be able to just turn it off.

      Much ado about nothing.

      • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        “If sensitive information is not saved” is doing a lot of heavy lifting for you there. The issue is that it saves everything.

        • NoiseColor@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          But it doesn’t save completely everything. It does snapshots as far as I understand. So it’s unlikely a whole password would be there on a snapshot. And again, it had to be mentioned that anything can be excluded from recall or disabled completely.

          At this point it has to be again highlighted that gaining access to a computer is very hard and that in itself is game over scenario. More information can be gained from a keylogger than this recall feature.

          • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            A keylogger isn’t retroactive to before the keylogger was installed though. Recall is. Also, with Recall you don’t need to write keylogging software and get it past antimalware scans (and keep it from getting detected), you just have to get an infostealer past them one single time to take the Recall database.

              • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The video posted by Moorshou literally shows someone getting a password and a credit card number from it. Yes, the password was due to someone clicking the show password button momentarily but do we just never expect people to use those or to not use a password manager that would show the password on screen at some point? Due to it doing text recognition, you would literally be able to just search for “credit card” to find all the times when it was displaying a credit card field on a checkout page or “password” to find all the times someone is logging in or using their password manager. And that’s using the built in search, not even exfiltrating the data and processing it with more specialized tools.

                You really need to watch that video to see what it can do and how easily it can do it.