The long-awaited day is here: Apple has announced that its Messages app will support RCS in iOS 18. The move comes after years of taunting, cajoling, and finally, some regulatory scrutiny from the EU.

Right now, when people on iOS and Android message each other, the service falls back to SMS — photos and videos are sent at a lower quality, messages are shortened, and importantly, conversations are not end-to-end encrypted like they are in iMessage. Messages from Android phones show up as green bubbles in iMessage chats and chaos ensues.

Apple’s announcement was likely an effort to appease EU regulators.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    It’s a terrible move, especially to make it default.

    It’s just as bad a protocol as SMS in its own way:

    It’s still tied to a phone number/sim, so you can’t just login to the service via a browser or an app.

    It has lots of failures, worst of all, SILENT FAILURES, where you don’t even know your messages aren’t being sent - just look at the communities around here discussing it.

    There’s no common protocol here really, lots of parts work only by decree of each host (e.g. iOS won’t have E2EE with anyone not on iOS, because that requires every cell provider to agree to the config they’re going to use.

    This is the 21st century, and this is the best they can do - a protocol that fails with no notice? Without standardized encryption? That’s tied to hardware?

    I had a better experience in 2009 running Pidgin on my phone and my laptop using XMPP. That didn’t require a phone number - I could login and see my messages in both places simultaneously… 15 years ago.

    No, RCS is a way to make the plebes think they’ve got a new and better system while still delivering garbage.

    Love you downvoters that don’t know enough to argue, just drive by and downvote.

    ONE person had the guts to say why he disagreed with me.

    Nevermind that BorgDrone explained what’s wrong with RCS better than I care to. You drive-by downvoters can’t even be bothered to learn about RCS.

    RCS is garbage. Plain and simple. I will never allow it on my devices, just like with Whatsapp, Facecrap, Twitter, Instagram, etc.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s still tied to a phone number/sim, so you can’t just login to the service via a browser or an app.

      Damn, if only phones had phone numbers and SIM cards… That must really suck for future iPhone users. Apple really dropped the ball.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 days ago

      But SMS still needs an upgrade, because it’s not going to be killed of if there isn’t a slot-in replacement, and so something has to take its role of being a messaging system where your carrier directly verifies your control of your phone number.

      That’s why RCS exists.

    • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      Why do we all need to respond when that one user who did respond put you in your place and made it clear that you’re just an angry moron yelling at the sky? Downvotes are exactly what’s called for here. Piss off idiot. You’re getting the exact amount of respect you deserve.

    • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      24 days ago

      Who even uses sms/mms these days? The only cases I see myself using sms is the poorly implemented 2fa over sms, which is bad since sim hijack is a real threat.

      Other than that whatsapp is the norm around here, whether we like it or not. Some also use facebook messanger, but no1 uses mms, it never picked up with the astronomical prices that carriers kept around for no good reason. I wish more people used telegram or signal, but 99% of my contacts don’t, so whatsapp it is.

      • Meltrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Like 90% of Americans who have android phones use SMS. WhatsApp is more common in places outside the US. Not inside.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        It’s still common in the USA for some reason. I think because SMS has been free for a long time and people don’t like change. Other apps gained popularity elsewhere in the world because SMSes were expensive.

      • out@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        I use it to communicate with my family

        It’s more convenient than chat apps.

        • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          What is more conveniant about sms compared to other apps? You still have to open the app, choose the contact from the list and start typing. It’s the exact same options. If I do it on the sms app, signal app, telegram or messanger app it’s still the same 2 taps then start typing. The only difference is what’s on the other side. If they only use sms then it’s obvious you have no other choice of communicating with them, but you can’t say it’s more conveniant.

          • cor315@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            It’s convenient because I don’t have to tell my family to use a different app. It’s hard enough to get them to install whatsapp, let alone actually use it. And I don’t even like using whatsapp.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        I try not to.

        I’ll happily use one or more of any of dozens of proper modern, network-based messaging systems. A few off the top of my head, none of which must be tied to hardware/sim/phone number (Signal is working on moving away from phone numbers, and it’s still not tied to a phone number the same way RCS is):

        Matrix

        Signal

        Conversations

        Simplex

        Wire

        Or pick an XMPP server and client, there’s plenty out there. I was using XMPP on my phone in 2009, chatting, sending uncompressed videos to people on desktops/laptops.

        Hell, even Telegram is a thousand times better than this RCS garbage.

        Don’t get me started on the privacy nightmare of WhatsApp… Holy shit, may as well not even care about privacy or encryption.

        (I have most of these messaging apps on my phones and my laptop, because they work).

        • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 days ago

          Unfortunately, no matter how good the alternatives are, you are stuck with whatever is on the other end. I can’t force anyone to change their main app for comms. Even if I do manage to get them to install anything else, they will realise they only use it with me and probably drop it next time they change their phone.

          While I do agree whatsapp is a privacy nightmare , I also see why it won’t go away anytime soon. You only need someone’s phone number to contact them, you get easy media transfers although compressed to shit, it’s still serviceable and it’s carier independant, and most importantly free even internationaly. People even started using it for audio calls due to higher quality audio over the plain voice calls. All these reasons create the perfect mix for the average privacy-ignorant person to overlook any competitors.