• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      First, individually targeted advertisement should be illegal. Instead of trying to figure out who I am and serving me ads based on that, they should only be able to look at server side facts. What is the video? This is how television and radio ads have worked for ages. You have a video about SomePopBand, you advertise concert tickets. You have a video about bikes, you advertise bike stuff. You don’t know who I am. Suddenly, the motivation for most of the privacy invading, stalking, nonsense is gutted.

      Some people would still block those static ads. If they showed some restraint, I think more people would accept them. But that’s a sad joke- no profit driven org is going to show restraint.

      Secondly, if they can’t ethically run the business at a profit, the business probably doesn’t deserve to exist. That or it’s a loss leader to get people into the ecosystem.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        You do know you can enter into your Google settings and disable all tracking and targeting, right? And you can ask them to delete all information they already hold on you.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes. However, it’s an assumption they honor those requests and don’t try to track you anyway.

          Plus Google isn’t the only company trying to do individualized targeted advertising.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Google is operating at a 24% net profit margin. They don’t need to get their shareholders more money…

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you actually understand how this works? It’s a beautiful statement and oh so noble, but it just flies against how the world really works.

        At some point, maybe not today, but at some point, you’re going to be saving up for your retirement. Your money will be invested; either passively or actively. If active, a fund manager (or maybe even yourself) will be spending time, every single day, wondering how to maximise the invested cash. If passive, you’re letting a WHOLE lot of fund managers make the decisions for you (wisdom of the crowd). Either way, Google better fucking perform or the investors will go elsewhere.

        And you’ll be an investor too, asking for Google to do better than anyone else or you’ll take your savings elsewhere.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If investors go elsewhere then they’re trading for a higher risk and return ratio than a massive company with rich history like Google. Plus, it frequently performs large buybacks and offers, and even offered a dividend recently. There is always going to be something attractive to investors, here.

        • bravesirrbn ☑️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          One thing I genuinely don’t get: why does a company making this much money need “investors”? (Other than participating in the make-rich-people-richer scheme)

    • Brutticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Youtube doesn’t pay attention to what ads get approved, or where they get served. Ive heard stories of people getting served two hours full amateur movies as ads, Ive heard of people getting soft core porn served as an ad, to actual scams and crypto pitches. It’s like Facebooks new AI enabled algorithm. There is actual danger, considering children and the elderly get sucked in to youtubes black hole?

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I watched a couple videos on the Diddy case, and a couple days later my whole feed was filled with the worst conspiracy theories and Christian preachers.

        I watch one Youtuber talking about pyramids, YouTube fills my whole suggestions with ancient alien conspiracies.

        I watched one cover of a song, I get recommended the same song for weeks.

        I watch one reaction video, the whole feed turns into reaction videos within minutes.

        It’s a fight against the algorhytm and it isn’t fun. It’s incredible how dumb it is after all these years, and those algprhythms are partly to blame that everyone feels more miserable than they are.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes right. But what does the investor environment look like today? Profit, not users, is what everyone is counting. If Google says “we’re burning cash in all businesses but search, but hey we’re nice”, investors will take their investments to more profitable businesses.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They actually have a pretty huge net profit margin and what basically amounts to a monopoly on advertisement, so even if their ads reached less intended targets it wouldn’t hurt their bottom line much.

          • Anas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Didn’t you know? It’s doesn’t matter that they’re still making billions more than they ever made, numbers have to go higher.

    • Barowinger @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Make a fair payment model. No classic subscription. But pay per watched minute, and when you hit a certain amount of minutes, every additional minute is free.