• anon6789@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          15 days ago

          There’s absolutely a good number of duplicates among the list they shared.

          The bigger implication is of the 4 publishers in this lawsuit, 3 of them are in The Big Five publishers, who hold rights to the vast majority of books (60-80-ish % of English language books) from this century and probably a good chunk of the last one. If they win, this is the tip of the iceberg.

          • Xantharian_ocelot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            More like IP of the iceberg unfortunately.older books should be made available and not hidden behind licenses and unavailability because of greed

            • anon6789@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 days ago

              I largely agree. I don’t know the best solution for copyright. On one hand, I don’t think that necessarily the creators’ kids deserve rights forever. They didn’t make the stuff. But on the other hand, who does get the money after the creators are gone? The publisher in this case should get something for publishing physical materials or for marketing their wares that sell, but again, they didn’t create it so someone should get something.

              I do think that if nobody does anything with a work for x amount of time (maybe 10 years) then it should be fair game for anyone that does.

              Even things like old games, if I download a Contra NES ROM, how am I hurting Nintendo or Konami?

              If I download LotR, how am I ripping off Tolkien? I’m not stealing a hard copy. I could borrow it from a physical library. Why can’t I borrow it from an electronic library? The person that deserves the rights to the literal story is dead. He doesn’t care.