• RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Except food is a physical good that needs to be transported, while the service is still provided by low wage workers from across the globe.

    If a corporation gets to provide the service from where it’s cheaper, they can’t be mad people buy it from where it’s cheaper.

    • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Service provider must acquire hardwares for the data centre at local vendor pricing.

      Service provider must hire someone local to work in your local data centre.

      Service providers need to pay local electricity and bandwidth rates.

      List goes on. Just because you don’t interface with the local aspects of business doesn’t mean they don’t exist and add extra costs.

      If you want to pay lower rate, as I stated earlier, make your narrative work: use local payment methods, billing address and use the service locally to the locality you’re paying in. Then they’ve got nothing to argue against you as you’re using services in that lower cost region.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except the hardware is purchased using a global framework contract that uses the volume as a reason for deep discounts.
        It gets put in a rack by a local guy and then remotely provisioned by some person from a low cost country.
        Electricity in datacenters is purchased at wholesale prices and muchuch cheaper than what consumers pay…
        The list goes on and on.

        The higher prices in countries has only very marginally to do with the higher costs.

        Money grabbing corporations will charge what the market will bare.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Internet isn’t free. It takes copper or fiber cable, switching and routing equipment, labor to operate and install them, and electricity to run it all. Those costs are also lower in other countries.

      So if you subscribe in a low-cost country, does it make sense for them to let you use the high-cost infrastructure?

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is just some Telcos that price for data usage and put in usage caps. But this is only a way to price gauge customers. In the EU most ISPs operate without datacaps and are much cheaper month to month than in the US (my 1gb symmetric fiber connection without datacaps costs around 30 euro per month).

        Sure a data connection in a datacenter is more expensive, but is either shared across datacenter customers or a customer gets their own. And again, global players have framework contracts with other global players… so maybe Orange Business Services provides the internet connection for their DC operation globally.

        The cost for the things they have to source locally is highly overestimated. Usually budgets they spend locally on stuff like advertising are much higher.