If you ever wanted to read about fake druids vs. environmental activists, now’s your chance.

  • 555@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Normally I would say this damage was inappropriate. But, considering humanity is going to be eradicated in the next hundred years, give or take, I think maybe we should be doing more to slow that down.

      • 555@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The squeaky wheel gets the oil. Obviously humanity is not being squeaky enough. Maybe if enough things are destroyed, The rest of the world will finally pay attention.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Why do you think “the world” matters? This is mostly the fault of a few corporations and their executives couldn’t give less of a shit about what someone does to Stonehenge.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      FWIW this kind of alarmist talk only lets people write off your comment as hysterical. Humans are not going to go extinct in the next 100 years, Canada isnt going to become hotter than Arabia and become unlivable.

      What we might (and even possibly the most likely scenario is to) get is wide scale societal breakdown, starvation of billions, mass migration of billions of those currently living in regions that become uninhabitable but dont starve, and the consequant resource wars that those entail. The future is bleak enough without making up even worse things that wont happen.