• Rekhyt@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The register providing contrast to the AWS infrastructure build out:

    The Register is aware of government agencies building on-prem private clouds – sometimes on open source platforms – so they can scour code to soothe their security worries.

    That’s just a local data center, guys. Like how everything was done before “the cloud” became a buzzword.

    • progandy@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There is some difference I see in the management layer, with more dynamic resource allocation in a cloud infrastructure compared to traditional data center usage.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      AWS is an American company. If the US goes facist, Trump could order Amazon to give him a copy of everything they have in their TS cloud

      • FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s why you build it in Australia and only give Australian citizens with appropriate security clearances direct operational access.

    • Recant@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well I would think that if the customer, in this case the Australian Signals Directorate, encrypted all data prior to going to AWS, it would be protected from any data mining that Amazon does.

      I am sure that the ASD isn’t just posting the information unencrypted on AWS or solely trusting Amazon’s encryption where Amazon also has a copy of the key.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well yes and no. For one there is lots of metadata like access times, the IPs that connect and their locations, traffic amount, etc.

        But also like with all “cloud solutions” you are just outsourcing your uptime reliability issues. And for a system like that, im not sure outsourcing that is a great idea.

        • Recant@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes that metadata can exist but can’t that be obscured if AWS isn’t connected to directly?

          I think some of the technical details of how the ASD intends to ensure data protection/confidentiality/integrity are omitted for national security reasons.

          • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It looks like it will be on prem, but then i dont even understand why they would involve amazon at all? Just use the existing public solutions. As soon as any major part of a system that is connected to the internet has proprietary code in it, you cant really trust it to protect secret information anymore.

            • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s won’t be on-prem, but it will be dedicated data centres, built and run by Amazon, so almost the same as. Why? Because AWS runs better data centres than the gov ever could.

              Gov is outsourcing the physical infrastructure risk, just like any other ocmpany that puts their stuff in the cloud.

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They hand a shitload of money to Amazon, who then set up one of their AWS data centers complete with software and all, but only allow the government access. 8 don’t know what they’re gonna do with the data center, but the data center construction will probably be absolutely fine.