The energy giant Shell has quietly backed away from a pledge to rapidly increase its use of “advanced recycling”, a practice oil and petrochemical producers have promoted as a solution to the plastics pollution crisis.

“Advanced” or “chemical” recycling involves breaking down plastic polymers into tiny molecules that can be made into synthetic fuels or new plastics. The most common form, pyrolysis, does so using heat.

Shell has invested in pyrolysis since 2019, touting it as a way to slash waste. That year, the company used oil made via pyrolysis in one of its Louisiana chemical plants for the first time. And it began publicizing a new goal for the technology: “Our ambition is to use 1m tonnes of plastic waste a year in our global chemicals plants by 2025.”

But recently, the company rolled back that promise with little fanfare: “[I]n 2023 we concluded that the scale of our ambition to turn 1m tonnes of plastic waste a year into pyrolysis oil by 2025 is unfeasible,” it said in its 2023 sustainability report, published in March.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    Plastic recycling is bullshit. A lot of recycling is fine- paper, glass, metal, all recyclable. And they should be because we use up way too many trees, way too much sand and destructively mine way too much metal.

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Good point! I’ll one up and say reuse of those materials works exponentially better than recycling. And of course reduction of use is exponentially even better than that. But those words dont work well with the consumer capitalist oligarchs so they never talk about it.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oddly enough, no one accepting glass as a recyclable material. It’s always “more work than it worth”. Infuriating.

      • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I.e. not as cheap as killing the planet with plastics. Sure, there are environmental costs, but we won’t see those this quarter!

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Glass recycling is bullshit too.

      Should be deposits and reuse on those, not [edit: as much focus on] recycling