• Franklin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    A live-action Halo is a terrible idea, as is a live-action Avatar.

    Some media is so ingrained in its spectacle that to make live action work, you’d have to spend Marvel levels of money on special effects, and why? When animation is right there.

    Sure, you might be able to appeal to a larger audience, but how’s that working out for you?

    • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Halo has worked live action in the past, albiet for shorter durations (Halo 3 and ODST both had really well done live action ad campaigns, plus there was Forward Unto Dawn).

      The problem is Paramount completely missed the mark in terms of tone and faithfulness to the source material, and it seems like they didn’t even try. They just went “Big green guy punches aliens, that’s what those gamerzz like, right? We can do that for a few million bucks.”

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It wasn’t even that. If they had just gone for a grittier more realistic take it would have been fine on visuals and effects. The acting though was cringe worthy at times and the writing wasn’t any better. It just wasn’t a fun show to watch.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        And one where MasterChief doesn’t remove his helmet at every opportunity and doesn’t have sex with the first sketchy woman he meets.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The helmet thing is at odds with how our film industry works. Actors really are paid commensurate to their popularity and if your big role doesn’t have your face on it then you don’t get paid as much. So either you have to hire an A lister who doesn’t mind, (the Mandalorian did this and there was still tension), or you settle for a modified helmet or having the helmet off whenever you can rationalize it.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not that I think it should work this way, but could always just pick a lesser known actor willing to settle for a paycheck to be “David Prowse’s Darth Vader” and then dub them over with someone more famous who is paid a lesser amount of money to be “James Earl Jones’ Darth Vader”.

    • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I legit like the live action avatar. It isn’t the best thing ever, but I am actually legitimately enjoying it and it’s changes.