Meta “programmed it to simply not answer questions,” but it did anyway.

  • doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Nobody is forcing you to use it.

    I’m using it and I see great value in it. And if there are people that see value in a product then it’s worth the investment.

    • jeeva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, people are being forced to use it if they want to, for instance, search using Google or Bing.

      As the parent comment suggested, or there’s no way to opt out, currently.

      I’m glad you see value in it; I think the injection of LLM queries into search results I want to contain accurate results (and nothing more) a useless waste of power.

      • doodledup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Injecting that into search result is a bad thing, I’m with you on that. Try DuckDuckGo. They use Bing but don’t insert all of that AI crap. The results are much more vanilla. It’s actually easier to find stuff because it’s not that cluttered.

    • trollbearpig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I always ask all people defending AI, or rather LLMs, what’s the great value they all mention in their comments. So far the “best” answer I got was one dude using LLMs to extract info from decades old reports that no one has checked in 20 years hahaha. So glad we are allowing LLMs to deetroy the environment and plagiarize all creative work for that lol.

      So, what is the great value you see man?