• Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You’ve taken the comic way too literally. Homelessness is a policy choice, and politicians are responsible for failing to allocate funds towards prevention, housing, etc. That applies to politicians at every level of government, with varying levels of responsibility/ability.

    Reality is more complicated than you’re viewing it.

    junkies and other socially unfit people

    You don’t seem to understand what leads a person to do drugs either.

    https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/what-does-rat-park-teach-us-about-addiction

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234816/

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-80897-8

    The financially wise decision is to house people, keep them fed, and in good health. Because when politicians let housing get fucked, when they let people starve, when they let them be ill, you get problems that get expensive in the form of prison time, police budgets, and crime rates. This is an area where doing the morally right thing is the most cost effective thing. Dehumanizing people as “junkies” and “socially unfit” just makes everything worse, for yourself included.

    • redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The financially wise decision is to house people, keep them fed, and in good health.

      Feel free to invest into housing and then practice what you preach.

      Also, I’m not dehumanizing junkies and socially unfit people. They’re definitely human. Being human however does not entitle you to free shift from people who are actually functional.

      If anything, it’s the people who say we should give them a home and food that are the ones who do the dehumanizing, treating them like pets that shouldn’t be left outside in the cold.