The most striking proposals were for the elimination of medical debt for millions of Americans; the “first-ever” ban on price gouging for groceries and food; a cap on prescription drug costs; a $25,000 subsidy for first-time home buyers; and a child tax credit that would provide $6,000 per child to families for the first year of a baby’s life.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    No. It’s basically a continuation of the child tax credit that the republicans killed. It lifted half of kids out of poverty that were in poverty and it was a very very popular covid relief program.

    • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      very very popular covid relief program

      I mean, everyone’s happy when money is flowing in. But someone has to pay for this.

      Also: 6k is pretty much nothing compared to the long term cost of raising the child. It really is a populist move - she’s buying votes with taxpayer money

      • Mathazzar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, you see… i want the taxes I pay to go to helping people. We could instead, say, stop giving as much to the DoD. We could raise taxes on corporations and close off shore loopholes… you know, basic good governance.

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          i want the taxes I pay to go to helping people

          I generally agree with this, but I’d rather see government spending my money on infrastructure, like roads, power plants, research ect. so everyone benefits instead of giving it away for free.

            • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Society benefits from children not growing up in extreme poverty

              True, but giving money for free isn’t a proper way of fighting with poverty. The proper way would be introducing reforms that make housing, healthcare and education fundamentally cheaper. That would be effective at fixing the very causes that make people impoverished

              • snooggums@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Making things cheaper doesn’t help people in extreme poverty who have no money.

                Giving them money does!

                • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Making things cheaper doesn’t help people in extreme poverty who have no money.

                  They have no money, because everything they need to live, is expensive!!!