rhabarba@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agoOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusmarc.infoexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up18arrow-down1external-linkOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusmarc.inforhabarba@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squarewaigl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·26 days agoIs OpenBSD seriously still using CVS for development?
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·26 days agoYeah, that’s weird. It’s pretty unorthodox to use a pharmacy chain for development.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·25 days agoTo be fair, they have a pufferfish as a mascot, so there’s bound to be some need for pharmaceuticals.
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·26 days agoYes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
minus-squarechellomere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·26 days agoFor example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·26 days agoOpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
Is OpenBSD seriously still using CVS for development?
Yeah, that’s weird. It’s pretty unorthodox to use a pharmacy chain for development.
To be fair, they have a pufferfish as a mascot, so there’s bound to be some need for pharmaceuticals.
Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.