• 4lan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    so you dont see the difference between us killing one of our own and someone else doing it?

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Both are dead.

      We didn’t kill anyone. We don’t know the facts, that’s why the US State Department is investigating.

      • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        US State Department is investigating waiting for idf to investigate.

        It’s almost been a year of Israel indiscriminately killing in the area and the state department still refuses to do an investigation. Still waiting for Israel to investigate themselves.

        But yeah sure. We’re totally gonna do something other than fund and supply weapons

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This has nothing to do with the finding of fact as to how this woman died

          In fact,it’s not true. First, let’s ignore the fact that this woman apparently from small arms fire which we don’t supply to the Israelis. Congress wrote a bill to supply other weapons to Isreal. to Isreal. It was unable to put restrictions on sale. That left it in Biden’s lap. Biden asked State to evaluate how the Israelis were using weapons as it pertains to standing US law. The result was that State could not find a legal reason not to supply.

          You can have your own feelings on the matter, but not your own facts

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              So, there’s a report from state that says Isreal is using weapons in line with US law and someone at state doesn’t agree? Call it the reason for resignation? Fact is it is still a report issued to the President

                • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  When a report is issued it becomes an item that can be subject to supena. Therefore, the House could get it and use it in investigation of Biden had he not followed it

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The result was that State could not find a legal reason not to supply.

            Yeah, imagine that. Someone from the Biden administration pretending not to see the obvious.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              We are a nation of laws. You may not like them. You may ridicule them. But you mind them anyway. It’s no different for the President unless you’re Trump

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You celebrate bad faith in government when it’s in favor of genocide.

                You’re no different than Trumpers who rejoiced that the system “works” when SCOTUS overturned Roe.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Pretending to see no genocide when it’s fucking obvious so you don’t have to abide by the Leahy Law is absolutely bad faith, even though you clearly approve of the results.