• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Folks, the docker runtime is open source, and not even the only one of its kind. They won’t charge for that. If they tried to make it closed source, everyone would just laugh and switch to one of several completely free alternatives. They charge for hosting images, build time on their build servers, and various “premium” developer tools you don’t need. In fact, you need none of this, you can do all of it yourself on whatever hardware you deem to be good enough. There are also many other hosted alternatives out there.

    Docker thinks they have a monopoly, for some reason. If you use the technology, you are probably already aware that they don’t.

      • cheet@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Windows container runtime is free as well, simply install the docker runtime from chocolatey or winget along with the Windows Containers and Hyper-V windows features. This is what we do on some build machines for CI.

        Theres no reason to use desktop other than “ease of use”

        • TrumpetX@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          There are some reasons. Networking can get messed up, so Docker Desktop “fixed that” for you, but the dirty secret is it’s basically a Linux VM with Docker CE and some convenience network routes.

          • cheet@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Youre talking about Linux containers on Windows, I think commenter above was referring to windows containers on Windows, which is its own special hell for lucky folks like me.

            Otherwise I totally agree. Ive done both setups without docker desktop.