Surprised pikachu face

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Okay but what problem does that solve? Is the solution setting up our own spambots to fill forums with arguments counter to their bullshit spambots? I don’t see how an LLM improves literally anything ever in any circumstance.

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You seem unnecessarily hostile about this. If you don’t like LLM just move on.

      This is exactly why this sub about technology is better off without business news. You’re just reacting to something you hate and directing that at others.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        But answer the question maybe

        Also, my “hate” was very clearly directed towards LLMs and not a “person”.

    • utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      FWIW I did try a lot (LLMs, code, generative AI for images, 3D models) in a lot of ways (CLI, Web based, chat bot) both locally and using APIs.

      I don’t use any on a daily basis. I find it exciting that we can theoretically do a lot “more” automatically but… so far the results have not been worth the efforts. Sadly some of the best use cases are exactly what you highlighted, i.e low effort engagement for spam. Overall I find that either working with a professional (script writer, 3D modeler, dev, designer, etc) is a lot more rewarding but also more efficient which itself makes it cheaper.

      For use cases where customization helps while quality does matter much due to scale, i.e spam, then LLMs and related tools are amazing.

      PS: I’d love to hear the opinion of a spammer actually, maybe they also think it’s not that efficient either.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have personally found generative-text LLMs quite good for creating titles. As an example, I have a few hundred tweets that I’m trying to put into a file, and I’ll use an LLM to create a human-readable name for them. It’s much better than a lot of the other summarisation mechanisms (like BERT) I’ve tried with it, but it’s still not perfect, because the model tends to output the same thing in slightly different words each time, so repeat runs will often result in the same thing with a different title.

        But, that is also a fairly limited use case.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        From all the studies available, LLMs increased the rate at which low skilled workers complete tasks. They also lower accuracy, so expect some of the tasks to be done incorrectly.

        If your metric for “improves” is being a better low skill drone forever then yes I’m sure it’s helping you. Here is a novel idea, maybe learn the language from a reliable source instead of taking the word of a bullshit generator at face value?

        • DavidDoesLemmy@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Here’s an idea, maybe start with curiosity about how someone is getting value out of it? It’s possible you don’t know everything about other people’s experiences.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s something being shoved down our throats every second of every day and I’ve seen enough to know I don’t like it. Curiosity was satiated a long ass time ago. It’s just a bigger power draw than Cryptocurrency but somehow magically even less value.

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        improves my experience coding in unfamiliar languages

        Alan Perlis said “A programming language that doesn’t change the way you think is not worth learning.”

        So… if you code in another language without actually “getting it”, solely having a usable result, what is actually the point of changing languages?

        • DavidDoesLemmy@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have a job to do. And I understand the other language conceptually, I am just rusty on the syntax.

          Also the chat feature is invaluable. I can highlight a piece of code and ask what it does, and copilot explains it.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly. I see AI as a tool to automate the boring parts, if you try to automate the hard parts, you’re going to have a bad time.

          Take the time to learn the tools you use thoroughly, and then you can turn to AI to make your use of those tools more efficient. If I’m learning woodworking, for example, I’m going to learn to use hand tools first before using power tools, but there’s no way I’m sticking to hand tools when producing a lot of things. Programming isn’t any different, I’ll learn the language and its idioms as deeply as I can, and only then will I turn to things like AI to spit out boilerplate to work from.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m not sure how to succinctly do that.

              When I learn a new language, I:

              1. go through whatever tutorial is provided by the language developers - for Rust, that’s The Rust Programming Language, for Go, it’s Tour of Go and Effective Go
              2. build something - for Go, this was a website, and for Rust it was a Tauri app (basically a website); it should be substantial enough to exercise the things I would normally do with the language, but not so big that I won’t finish
              3. read through substantial portions of the standard library - if this is minimal (e.g. in Rust), read through some high profile projects
              4. repeat 2 & 3 until I feel confident I understand the idioms of the language

              I generally avoid setting up editor tooling until I’ve at least run through step 3, because things like code completion can distract from the learning process IMO.

              Some books I’ve really enjoyed (i.e. where 1 doesn’t exist):

              • The C Programming Language - by Brian Kernighan and Dennis Richie
              • Programming in Lua - by Roberto Ierusalimschy
              • Learn You a Haskell for Great Good - by Miran Lipovača (available free online)

              But regardless of the form it takes, I appreciate a really thorough introduction to the language, followed by some experimentation, and then topped off with some solid, practical code examples. I generally allow myself about 2 weeks before expecting to write anything resembling production code.

              These days, I feel confident in a dozen or so programming languages (I really like learning new languages), and I find that thoroughly learning each has made me a better programmer.

              • utopiah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Thanks for that, was quite interesting and I agree that completion too early (even… in general) can be distracting.

                I did mean about AI though, how you manage to integrate it in your workflow to “automate the boring parts” as I’m curious which parts are “boring” for you and which tools you actual use, and how, to solve the problem. How in particular you are able to estimate if it can be automated with AI, how long it might take, how often you are correct about that bet, how you store and possibly share past attempts to automate, etc.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I honestly don’t use it much, but so far, the most productive uses are:

                  • generate some common structure/algorithm - web app, CLI program, recursive function, etc
                  • search documentation - I may not know what the function/type is, but I can describe it
                  • generate documentation - list arguments, return types, etc

                  But honestly, the time I save there honestly isn’t worth fighting with the AI most of the time, so I’ll only do it if I’m starting up a big greenfield project and need something up and going quickly. That said, there are some things I refuse to use AI for:

                  • testing - AI may be able to get high coverage, but I don’t think it can produce high quality tests
                  • business logic - the devil is in the details, and I don’t trust AI with details
                  • producing documentation - developers hate writing documentation, which is precisely why devs should be the ones to do it; if AI could do it, other devs could just use AI to generate it, but good docs will do far more than what AI can intuit
                  • utopiah@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Super, thanks again for taking the time to do so.

                    I can’t remember if I shared this earlier but I’m jolting down notes on the topic in https://fabien.benetou.fr/Content/SelfHostingArtificialIntelligence so I do also invest time on the topic. Yet my results have also been… subpar so I’m asking as precisely as I can how others actually benefit from it. I’m tired of seeing posts with grand claims that, unlike you, only talk about the happy path in usage. Still, I’m digging not due to skepticism as much as trying to see what can actually be leveraged, not to say salvaged. So yes, genuine feedback like yours is quite precious.,

                    I do seem to hear from you and others that to kickstart what would be a blank project and get going it can help. Also that for whatever is very recurrent AND popular, like common structures, it can help.

                    My situation though is in prototyping where documentation is sparse, if even existent, and working examples are very rare. So far it’s been a bust quite often.

                    Out of curiosity, which AI tools specifically do you use and do you pay for them?

                    PS: you mention documentation is both cases, so I imagine it’s useful when it’s very structured and when the user can intuit most of how something works, closer to a clearly named API with arguments than explaining the architecture of the project.