• Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    Ok at first I thought the title was about a fake prop from a video game which somehow was worth 50m

    • ExFed@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I hate headlines like these. It feels like they’re intentionally ambiguous.

  • Escew@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    People will still buy these consoles and games. Nintendo won’t sell them. What’s the solution?

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      There are retro revival consoles that aren’t deliberately made to looks like the original incarnations. I think the issue here was that the consoles being sold were deliberate counterfeits of otherwise valuable original retro machines.

      For instance, litigious as they are Nintendo has either been unable or unwilling to snuff out things like the RetroN machines which play original Nintendo and SNES cartridges (and Genesis, and some others) but don’t claim to be a Nintendo machine or look like one in any way.

      That said, I personally would totally buy a fake OG JDM Super Famicom just to have on the shelf, or even a shell just that looks like one.

      • SlothMama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Nintendo doesn’t have a legal right to go after NES clones in the States because the patent on the NES expired and anyone is legally allowed to make perfect duplicates of NES hardware.

        The only legal ground Nintendo has is software copyright for games they published and / or licensed ( probably just published )