• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    Countless buildings would never be built if you didnt invent hammer and nails, being paid royalties for a few years by large businesses who make use of it seems pretty fair.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You have absolutely zero knowledge of history, I’m embarrassed for you.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        We’re very clearly not talking about history, we’re talking about the ridiculous hypothetical of if Hammering Nails to build Houses was patented today.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah pretty much, that comment set the mood. I’m cool, I hope you are too.

          It is interesting as a thought experiment if very basic human improvements could have been shut out from other people using them.

          What if, for example, Plato was able to “copy right” his ideas. Or if any of the ideas from the Renaissance where prevented from being iterated on. Would we have the scientific method today?

          Edit: Electricity? Pfft have fun with only one person owning the right to use it for 175 years. Next to no improvements for almost two centuries.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Again, people are not shut out from patented ideas. Tbey’re shut out from selling them to third parties. And Electricity WAS patented in the USA, they lasted 17 years from the date of issue.