• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anarchism just won’t work lol. People will band together, larger groups would survive and whoops! It’s countries all over again

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Anarchism is a lot of work negotiating, setting standards and consequences, balancing forces. Constant politics without an overarching state. Any concentration of capability for violence or resource to be shared must be extremely carefully handled.

      What you are describing is warlords filling a political vacuum caused by chaos.

      Someone has been misrepresenting anarchism to you.

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think the point he’s making is that anarchism is one big power vacuum and those are usually filled with warlords and power brokers. Anarchism can still exist within a state such as Christiania in Denmark and from what I’ve heard it works pretty well.

        • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It does seem like a power vacuum if you are fully convinced that power needs to be centralized.

          I am reminding the thread that the absence of distributed power is chaos, not anarchism.

          Anarchism is anything BUT a power vacuum. All the power is carefully doled out via negotiation and in no way lacking.

          Strong propaganda is devoted to supporting your presumption that power only exists when concentrated, so it does feel natural and common sense to say that.