A top economist has joined the growing list of China’s elite to have disappeared from public life after criticizing Xi Jinping, according to The Wall Street Journal. 

Zhu Hengpeng served as deputy director of the Institute of Economics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) for around a decade.

CASS is a state research think tank that reports directly to China’s cabinet. Chen Daoyin, a former associate professor at Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, described it as a “body to formulate party ideology to support the leadership.”

According to the Journal, the 55-year-old disappeared shortly after remarking on China’s sluggish economy and criticizing Xi’s leadership in a private group on WeChat.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        9 days ago

        Even then, it isn’t healthy, just healthier. The USA is still going to going to experience economic issues of a growing elderly population, it just won’t be as bad.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration that they can adjust at will. On the other hand, China’s leadership, being Han supremacist, is not receptive to immigration at all.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Immigration definitely helps, especially compared to China. I’m just noting that there will still be some decrease in the ratio of retired workers to current workers.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration

            glances at US immigration policy

            Does it?

            China’s leadership, being Han supremacist, is not receptive to immigration at all.

            Wit drier than a lint trap.

            • cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Coming from one of the foremost resident tankies here, that’s a glowing compliment. Thank you.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Does it?

              People still pay upwards of $10,000 US to get smuggled into the country that they will only work in for 4 years as basic farm and factory workers in a house of 20 people.

              The world is a mess and America is the gold mines of california with no gold in it. But a lot of people are getting rich selling immigrants the shovels.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                People still pay upwards of $10,000 US to get smuggled into the country that they will only work in for 4 years as basic farm and factory workers in a house of 20 people.

                You’re just describing human trafficking. This is modern slavery. Might as well brag about all the Africans who moved here in the 18th and 19th centuries.

                The world is a mess and America is the gold mines of california

                Who can forget the huge influx of East Asian immigrants flooding into the California gold mines to be worked to death in the mines? Another excellent example of American prosperity.

                • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Also you are wrong about how the east asian populace in California was used, as it often wasn’t about working the mines as much as them racking up a debt trying to get rich and then owing money so that they could be used as cheap labor elsewhere. God do you even actually have a point or is it just be angry at whatever people say?

                • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Oh it’s awful but I’m saying people are paying the privilege to be treated like shit in the US cause it’s “better” than their crumbling local country or beats the idea of their false impression of their crumbling country of origin.

                  I didn’t brag about it. But the US sure does have this happening at a rate hard to be ignored.

                  I mean I literally used an example that is historically known to have been basically a scam to import cheap labor and you still got defensive and hostile.

                  Your need to be right will kill any conversation you are part of.

          • rammer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration

            Except that even in the Americas the population is declining. There is a limit to it. The US can outlast many other countries because of immigration but it too has to face the same problem as everyone else.

            • cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Not really. They are the #1 immigration destination. If the US runs out of potential immigrants that means every other country is far worse off. This game is like the old joke about outrunning a bear: you don’t need to run faster than the bear — you only need to be faster than the guy next to you.

        • Shard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          This is the new normal for highly developed economies. The best they can hope for is a 1 to 1 replacement of their population. We’re not likely to see another baby boom occur.

          We’re not going to see a typical population pyramid any more. Because that means a large infant death rate and either war, disasters or a massive suicide epidemic cutting away the young adult population to get the pyramid shape.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            8 days ago

            Given that the amount of habitable land will decrease causing mass migrations, you don’t need a 1 to 1 ratio to maintain a population size.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          it just won’t be as bad.

          glances at Ferguson

          glances at Columbia

          glances at the NYC subway

          How bad are we talking?

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          9 days ago

          Basically, yes. The sides are nearly parallel, which is great. Compare with China’s, which forms a steep V. Once GenX hits retirement age they are completely screwed. The CCP’s recent push for “traditional family values” and increased birth rates is no coincidence.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 days ago

      The birthing rates are only dropping, in 15 years all of those people will be to old to work but there are not nearly enough to replace them.