This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/PaddyMayonaise on 2024-10-05 19:26:51+00:00.
More of a passing thought this afternoon, but I could never really understand this.
You always hear terms like “highly credible witness” and what not in reference to “witnesses” or “whistleblowers” from the MIC (Military Industrial Complex).
But at the same time the common claim is that the MIC is the one lying to all of and working hard to keep this secret and cause confusion in this space.
But, yet, the most populist witnesses recently are all from the MIC.
David Fravor spent over twenty years in the Navy before taking a job with Northrop Grumman and then later a subcontractor of them.
Luis Elizondo spent his entire adult life working in country intelligence and human intelligence. Today he still, allegedly, works for the Space Force.
David Grusch spent over a decade as an Air Force Officer before switching to a part time role in the Reserve and taking up various civilian positions with the USG.
All three stayed employed by the MIC and maintained their clearances despite their roles in UFO disclosure.
So why do we trust them? Why are they highly credible? Why is there not suspicion that they are plants or deception agents?
They all work for the MIC. They all came out publicly and continued to work for the MIC afterwards. They all kept their clearances. They all continue to work for the MIC to this day.
I’m not discrediting them, necessarily, it’s just a contraction here that I can’t wrap my head around and curious about the thoughts of others.