Wayback Machine back in read-only mode after DDoS, may need further maintenance.

  • tehmics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    this would be impossible

    Perfect.

    I’d be interested in seeing real examples where lives are threatened. I find it unlikely that the internet archive would be the exclusive arbiter of so-called deadly information

    • WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There was an actual example where a journalistic article about afghanistan accidentally leaked names of some sources and people who helped westerners in afghanistan, which did actually endanger those people’s lives.

      • tehmics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If they’re leaked, they’re leaked. The archive doesn’t change that one way or the other

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Gotcha so you actually stated your previous question in bad faith as you had no interest in the answer to begin with.