When Rogers announced plans to buy Shaw, Canada’s Competition Bureau fought the merger, citing concerns that the elimination of Shaw as a competitor would lead to harm for consumers, including price increases.
At the time, Rogers CEO Tony Staffieri pledged lower prices for customers and brushed aside competition concerns.
Earlier this year, Rogers upped the price of some cellphone, internet and home phone plans.
They just randomly increased my cell phone bill by 12% with absolutely no warning or reason. How the hell is that legal? What’s stopping them from randomly increasing it 100% sometimes and just stealing my money?
You are free to use another cell provider and vote for which ever party you think is not a corporate shill 🙃
☠️🦜
Should’ve stopped them from buying Shaw.
I seem to remember some list of “enforceable conditions” set out by the government for this merger. So those were bullshit, I guess.
Another W for the telecom cartel.
Their TV boxes are garbage too, my parents cannot get reliable 5GHz WiFi from the “gateway” and the devices cannot be configured to 2.4GHz only which works fine until it thinks the 5GHz signal is strong enough and automatically switches before dropping again. The only “solutions” Rogers provides are to move the router or to buy their overpriced “pod” repeaters.
Or wire in another router, and use the WiFi on that. It’s not great, with the double-NAT (most of Rogers routers are buggy in bridge-mode), but IMHO, it’s better than using their WiFi.
That doesn’t really help because the TV devices can’t be configured to use the non-gateway wifi network.
The only solution I can come up with is to add a wifi network like that, but then also get a chromecast for each TV and use a device with the app to cast the TV they want to watch.
On one hand I think it’s ok for rental prices to go up as device prices increase. But that should never happen after a customer has a device, at that point the device price was already locked in. If they rent an additional device? Sure that one could cost more, but not the existing ones
Honestly I would love to see laws that make rental units without the option to purchase illegal. (With appropriate limits on how much the purchase option costs)
Nah, they’ve already made their money on the rental within a year. Everything after that is gouging.
That’s why, if you have the option to buy a modem to use with their service, you can save a lot of money.
Never pay a rental fee or a subsidy (i.e. smartphone) if you can afford to buy it outright. That way, you save a ton on these overpriced fees, and you still own the device to sell later of you choose.
Hey, everyone – Check out Mr. Moneybags here!
In all seriousness, I do the same. We’re pretty fortunate to win at the game of life and not get stuck in the living-paycheque-to-paycheque hole, aren’t we?
Nah, this equipment is not as expensive as peoole think. But the ongoing cost to rent is astronomical.
Plus, if you can afford a wildly expensive TV service, you can afford to buy the equipment outright.
The real issue is that some equipment, like the Ignite TV box, isn’t sold separately, so you are always being gouged. 🤑
Sure, my experience was twenty years ago, but at the time my modem was roughly one month’s rent at a dive apartment.
but at the time my modem was roughly one month’s rent at a dive apartment.
No way!?
The last modem I purchased for Rogers supported their 1 gigabit plan, was a TP-Link cable modem back in 2018. It was $112.
Before that, I purchased one through Teksavvy, and it was probably cheaper.
These things pay for themselves in 6-12 months tops, then you’re saving money each month.
