• SuperFola@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Kitty is mentioned once in the article and that’s it. Doesn’t even mention its downside and how ghostty is so much better according to them.

      It’s a great project and all, but I’d love if people could stop stomping on others work just to appear better.

        • SuperFola@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Only says it’s fast on some specific benchmarks against alacrity. Not talking about why alacrity or kitty would not work on Linux/mac while ghostty does.

          Sure, it’s interesting that he managed to optimize so many things. But the claims in the picture are unproven.

          • tun@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Not talking about why alacrity or kitty would not work on Linux/mac while ghostty does.

            Does the picture/article claim alacritty or kitty would not work on Linux/mac? Where can I read that?