Will Lewis, the company’s chief executive, said the paper was “returning to our roots” of not making endorsements for the office.
The Washington Post’s chief executive told the newsroom on Friday that it would no longer endorse presidential candidates, breaking with decades of precedent at the newspaper.
“The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election,” wrote Will Lewis, The Post’s chief executive. “Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”
The Post has endorsed presidential candidates since 1976, Mr. Lewis wrote, when it gave its stamp of approval to Jimmy Carter, who went on to win the election. Before that, it generally did not make presidential endorsements, though it made an exception in 1952 to back Dwight Eisenhower.
Questions about whether The Post would endorse a candidate this year had spread for days. Some people speculated, without any proof, that the paper’s billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos, was being cowed by a prospective Trump administration because his other businesses have many federal government contracts.
Are you telling me Jeff Bezos the billionaire didn’t buy print media to make money?!
I hope the editorial staff takes a literal collective shit on his desk before walking out
The humor columnist already went rogue and endorsed Harris
Not paying to view someone want to share. Not giving them a single dime.
Huh, the slogan “Democracy Dies in Darkness” makes more sense now. It was a threat.
