Stats screenshot taken at the time of this post.

  • felsiq@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    Let’s say everybody in a state is equally culpable for electing shit leaders for the sake of the hypothetical: this would be fine at first, but what happens if Florida gets their shit together in 30 years and makes a unified push for a good leader and real quality of life improvements for the people? (please suspend your disbelief lmao). All their votes together would mean nothing because of the shit QoL 30 years of republicans would get them, and they’d be powerless to enact any positive change unless the states doing the best under the new system decided to allow it. That’s what I mean by self fulfilling prophecy; poor states can only get poorer and rich ones get richer.

    • Linktank@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      I think you’re confusing state government with federal government.

      The state governments can still enact their own state laws all they want. The high QoL states would still be voting for increased QoL at a federal level. Which would rise the tide even for the dipshits.

      • felsiq@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        I just don’t have any faith in the kind of good state laws could do if the state is already at rock bottom. Seems like it’d require federal intervention (that would be against the interests of all the rich states) imo, tho I can’t pretend to know where Americans like to draw the line for when federal aid is okay lol.