Instead of (or in addition to*) he, she, they and all of the more fine-grained pronouns such as xir, we could just invent one for everyone that doesn’t require prior knowledge of the person to which it’s being applied.

* I could see a neutral pronoun being used until you know for sure what regular gendered pronoun the person prefers. That way, you can always just play it safe with the neutral one if you want. No harm done.

By way of example, let’s say we used “it/it’s/its”. Obviously we wouldn’t use that because it sounds dehumanising, but it would work for every person with no chance of offence or bigotry (I think?). It doesn’t deny the person’s identity, it just makes their identity untethered to one small part of casual language in the same way it is now.

Do you agree, and if not, why not? I’m not sure where I would stand on such a proposal, so I’m interested to hear the for and against, particularly from the non-binary and trans folks.

P.S. I’m not saying we do away with gendered language entirely, just those introductory pronouns; the part of language that requires the speaker to make a snap judgement about the person’s identity based on unreliable visual and aural clues.

  • Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    many people don’t like they because it’s historically been more frequently used as

    This argument is worth nothing TBH. In the decades prior to 1960 it was also “historcally more frequent” that having a bank account was an exclusively male right, and certain people complained loudly when that changed and still refused to comply for about 15 more years (where many banks required a permission slip of the husband in question before even considering to give a woman an account of her own). Does that mean we should have never granted women the right to their own bank accounts just because it made a handful of people uneasy at the time?

    Big changes are rarely immediatly accepted by everyone, but we should never consider stopping or slowing down positive progress just because a few people “don’t like it”. If they are unwilling to adapt, that’s their problem to fix, not ours to prevent.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not saying it’s a reason to give up on it completely. I support neutral pronouns, and I’ve been trying to say they exclusively for everyone I do not personally know, but understanding why potential allies are reluctant and helping them get where you are will lead to much less resistance than “DO IT OUR WAY OR FUCK OFF AND DIE”.

      Sure, the assholes will never get on board, and fuck them anyway, but there are people who want to be supportive, but are uncomfortable with certain things because they are new to them. Understanding needs to go both ways in order to expand support.