• ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    And that’s what they have adds for on X? Some software and hardware that’s like 1% of their revenue? And they are one of the biggest add buyers? That’s the insane part. It would make more sense for Samsung or apple to buy adds for phones or laptops, you know, things everyone uses. IBM doesn’t have consumer products. Why are they spending so much money on X?

    • 🦘min0nim🦘@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      The whole premise of ads on Twitter is that they’re targeted.

      IBM don’t sell consumer crap. They sell smoke and mirrors to major governments and industry. They’re chasing jobs worth millions per pop. They want ads to target the people making those decisions.

      • Ilgaz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Actually I saw IBM consultant for a very large corp suggested Dell terminals while IBM end user things existed. For a modern mainframe, a PC is just a terminal emulator, browser (extensively used) and a development machine.

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        This would only make sense if targeting rich individuals was somehow significantly more expensive. They’re showing ads to very small group of X users. Their ads cost the same as other ads. They should not be spending more than companies selling consumer products.